Author:
Audience Rating:
Publication:
Genre:
Character Age:
TG Themes:
Other Keywords:
Permission:
by (AJ) Eric
On December 16, 1773, roughly 100 insurgents boarded four merchant vessels at Boston Harbor and threw 342 crates of tea overboard, protesting a newly-imposed tax on tea and the English Parliament that had unilaterally ordered it.
Sadly, they probably didn’t encounter a letter like this one in the week or so before the event.
December, 1773
Dear Sons of Liberty:
It has come to our attention that you are planning to protest the new tax on tea by boarding the four ships in Boston Harbor that brought it here and dumping the tea overboard.
Well and good. As one of our leaders said almost a decade ago. “taxation without representation is tyranny.” It is our hope that this action will be memorable, to the point of preventing the English Parliament from persisting in actions such as this, and from interfering with the right of companies originating here in New England to import and sell tea in competition with the East India Company.
We are eager to join you tonight and assist you in destroying the tea. Our only concern is that we have heard that you are planning to disguise yourselves as Mohawk warriors while doing this.
We fully understand the need for disguise. This mission will be considered treasonous by Governor Hutchinson’s colonial government here in Massachusetts Bay, and even though it will be happening under cover of dark, the chance of being identified is significant. (All the more so if, as some suggest, scores of bystanders come out to watch after the protest meeting at Faneuil Hall breaks up.)
However, your choice of disguise concerns us greatly. Indian braves — indeed, Mohawk males in general — are usually bare-skinned above the waist, and often do not wear very much below. Besides being a rather unconvincing choice of outfit for those of us who spend considerably more time indoors handling paperwork than outdoors hunting and gathering, there is a fundamental difficulty here.
Ocean harbors in general tend to be windy and damp, especially at night, even in temperate times of year. But here in the middle of December, it is bound to be bitterly cold as well. Any white man braving these conditions while half-clothed or worse is likely to become seriously ill. I believe that even our red neighbors do not usually make war this time of year, and hardly ever fight after dark.
There is also the question of removing those disguises afterward and re-adopting a normal appearance to avoid suspicion. It cannot have escaped your notice that Mohawk warriors cut their hair in distinctive and dramatic fashion. Any attempt on our part to do the same would lead to disaster later: even those of us who wear powdered wigs during the day are unlikely to plausibly wear them outside of our employment.
War paint may also be a concern: Indians know how to use it and how to remove it afterward. Few if any of us have that experience, and anyone who uses the wrong kind of paint and finds himself unable to remove it when the time comes will most likely have to wait days for it to wear off.
Fortunately, there is an alternative that solves most if not all of these difficulties. We need to disguise ourselves as women instead.
In contrast to the Mohawks, no sane woman in this colony would venture outside in this weather and not be fully clothed — probably covered as completely as they could be, for greatest comfort. And that extends to their head cover: our lack of feminine hair styles would not be visible. As for war paint, many women paint their faces even more extensively than Indian warriors do, albeit not as noticeably. We can do the same.
One additional benefit: it makes the most sense for us to pry open some or all of the wooden crates of tea, to assure that they cannot be recovered from the harbor floor the following day. It may occur to some of us to take a few of the tea leaves home while we await the repeal of the tax. Someone costumed as a Mohawk would have difficulty concealing anything. Fully covered in a woman’s clothes, it would be considerably easier.
And a final point: we have heard people refer to the upcoming endeavor as the Boston Tea Party. Who better than women to take part in such an event?
Respectfully yours,
the Hutchinson Street Irregulars
If you liked this post, you can leave a comment and/or a kudos!
Click the Thumbs Up! button below to leave the author a kudos:
And please, remember to comment, too! Thanks.



Comments
The voice of reason
Had they but listened.
Oh well. Fun story anyway..
Apparently the colonials drank a lot tea before but as a result of the disagreement switched over to coffee (well, sort of).
Some time ago I posted a blog post with this content:
Boston T-party
I just learned that the history books got it all wrong.
On December 16, 1773 there was a large gathering of transsexuals in Boston. The partying got a little bit out of hand and some damage to property was done. Some partipants had overdone their "war paint" more than a little which subsequently has led to misunderstandings.
I'm very happy to be able to set things straight ;)
Bru
Nice turn of satire...
In light of modern events, this bit of sardonic humor gave me quite a chuckle, Eric. Considering the English heritage of most of the protestors, it is a bit mystifying that they didn't choose to disguise themselves as women instead of Mohawk braves. The history of English rebellions and riots is rife with such deceptive maneouvers.
For example, in The Rebecca Riots (Wales, 1839–1843), groups of men in rural Wales, protesting against high tolls at turnpike gates, disguised themselves in women's clothing and blackened their faces. They called themselves "Rebecca and her daughters," likely referencing a biblical passage about possessing the gates of their enemies (Genesis 24:60).
In The Western Rising (England, 1626–1632), anti-enclosure riots were fomented against the privatization of common lands. Mobs led by men dressed in women's clothing destroyed fences and property. The leaders often used the alias "Lady Skimmington".
And there were the Grain Riots (in both England and France, 17th-18th centuries). Mobs protesting food shortages and prices, sometimes led by women themselves, occasionally included men in women's clothing to blend in or leverage the leniency typically given to female rioters.
Apparently, there are certain advantages to cross-dressing. I wonder if the remnants of MAGA will resort to this after the current blight on our democracy is finally removed.
Hugs,
Sammy
I hadn’t really thought about it, but . . .
. . . I doubt Hancock, Adams and company intended to deceive anyone. They wanted deniability, and probably preferred that it not be very believable. A bit like Putin’s “little green men” in the Crimea back in ‘14.
Fun story, Eric!
— Emma
I believe the term “plausible deniability” wasn’t…..
Coined until the early 1960’s by the CIA, so I would expect that you are correct. Any deniability that our tea party participants sought was intended to be superficial. After all, anyone willing to mutually pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor, would also be willing to have their neighbors know about it.
It’s too bad that those sentiments have gone out of fashion.
D. Eden
“Hier stehe ich; ich kann nicht anders. Gott helfe mir.”
Dum Vivimus, Vivamus
"It Wasn't Me"
Poor disguise but everybody probably knew!
Americans drank tea before. It's a pity they still haven't learned how to make coffee.