After finding the same song on many different short video clips I wanted to find out more about the person behind the voice. It turns out there isn't a human being. It is all AI generated. Digging deeper turned up a lot of things about AI which I found fascinating and truthfully kinda worrying. It bothered me AI could be so good as a semi real person, could be generated in pictures, video, and voice. There is also a lot of legalities behind these false unreal persona. The most important one is they can't be copyright nor patented. They aren't real construct in the same context the actors and actresses in fictional stories aren't real. One may copyright a story one writes only if the author is real. Writing under a name other than one's legal name, the story is still written by a real person Thus the story may be legal to copyright. The dividing legal line is AI is artificial, no copyright authority.
If one wishes to explore further into the depth of AI generated songs, stories, pictures, etc. then I suggest google it. Which is funny in it's own way as google is becoming an AI search engine itself. The following is a couple places one might start. Our fictional stories might not be that much fiction after all. Kelly has a VR system and let me take a stroll through one of her programs. Once was enough, it scared me where humanity might be going.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922 Legals on AI generated content
https://tinyurl.com/msh97fyr One of the AI generated singers, albums, non people-people I found.
Hugs People
Barbie Jean
Comments
Google et Al will own the copyright
to just about everything in a couple of years if things carry on the way they are...
{No AI tool or reference was used in the creation of this post}
A few words of caution about AI
It is very easy to use an 'AI' enhanced search when using Google. Microsoft is thrusting it down our throats like there is no tomorrow.
I foresee a time when people will be sued by the likes of Google for AI Copyright infringement just because you used an the results of an AI enhanced search in your work.
Then, it will be up to you to prove that you didn't do what they say you did. Literally everything we do on our computers and on the internet in general will be copyrighted because AI was involved somewhere in the process and Google etc will want their share of your income. While this all based on my thoughts, we must all be aware of the dangers of using AI for anything.
I have decided that I'm avoiding AI it at all possible just like I don't 'do' social media. We will be in a battle to stop AI from infecting our work. On some systems, it is easier than others.
Google's AI [cough][cough] enhanced search can be disabled but it isn't easy and it is in their interest to make it as hard as possible. Microsoft is forever changing 'how to disable' features like Co-Pilot. It can change when you apply the latest set of patches.
Apple has an option in settings (next to Siri) that enables or disables the use of the local AI engine.
Linux? Well, unless you are unlucky with the choice of distro, you will be AI free unless you use it via a browser.
It is your work people. Google etc would love to take a cut of it without lifting a finger.
Be safe out there people. The AI Thieves are lurking in the shadows just waiting to strike.
Tilly Norwood, AI Actress
https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/tilly-norwoods-press-tour-...
Tilly Norwood an AI created actress and has received a lot of blow back from real actors and actresses. She does interviews
In one particularly odd interview with Piers Morgan and actor Tom Conti, which was recorded and posted online, Norwood seems to malfunction and abruptly begin speaking Chinese.
The author believed the mistakes were designed into Tilly Norwood during the interviews so people wouldn't take her too seriously and be afraid of an AI. If she starts ridding, roping, wrangling cows and goats, I'm going to start protesting. I'll cut her some slack if she sticks to milking cows.
Hugs People
Barbie Lee
"God, may I come home now."
Oklahoma born and raised cowgirl
Someone Clarify This For Me
How can all the animation movies and cartoons created down through the years be copyright and AI not? What am I missing? What about all the non real signs such as BuckyBeaver and other fictional creations be patented, copyright?
This seems like a black hole we have all stumbled into and the answer is who has the most money, the most political ;power?
Hugs People
Barbie Jean
Oklahoma born and raised cowgirl
Re: Clarification
Copyright on cartoons, is rather straight-forward. A business company paid people to draw and color the individual frames that got assembled into a cartoon movie. That business (owned and operated by human persons) owns the copyright.
The line starts to become a bit blurry when it comes to computer animation and CGI. For the most part, there are still human persons who create the parameters for the frame pictures that then get generated in sequence by computers for animations that are smoother than hand-drawn.
Computers can generate the individual frames faster than carbon-based artists of old. Plus the frames can contain a lot more details. Have you ever wondered why the cartoon characters of old only had four fingers to a hand, or why they had only uni-color clothes. Not to mention that they were either bald, or had three individual hairs, or the hair was a solid slab. It was all due to the complexity of hand-drawing the animation sequences.
As we move into the second half of the 2000s and into the 2010s computer rendering with ray tracing made rapid advances in technology and capability, to the point where still images started to approach photographic quality. Though each render still took a considerable amount of time on leading edge hardware. By the late 2010s the human creative aspect of computer generated images had become almost negligible. By then the AI (which, by the way, stands for Absolutely Idiotic) had started to take off, and the human creativity aspect had been reduces to specifying just a few basic parameters.
As it stands, the Absolute Idiot (a.k.a. AI) is basically nothing more than a massive plagiarist. As such, it is high time to enact legislation that makes any and all AI-generated and AI-enhanced content non-copyrightable, maybe even automatically placed in the Public Domain.