If you liked this post, you can leave a comment and/or a kudos!
Click the Thumbs Up! button below to leave the author a kudos:
And please, remember to comment, too! Thanks.
This story is 0 words long.
TopShelf TG Fiction in the BigCloset!
Checks can be made out & sent to:
Joyce Melton
1001 Third St.
Space 80
Calimesa, CA 92320
USA
Note: $6000 is the operating, maintenance and upgrade budget. Amounts received in excess of the $6000 will be applied to long term debt accrued over the last 19 years.
If you prefer, you can donate through Patreon:
Become a Patron!
Thank you!
Comments
Stephanie's Deal 7
Looks as if Stephanie has become a part of Steven. To bad that Robin has to be put away now. You have captured the basic premise of a good Sunday School Teacher and a narrow minded Pastor. Will be interesting to see how much of Stephanie stays after this.
May Your Light Forever Shine
May Your Light Forever Shine
stephanies deal #6
wow geting good want a lot more .hugs and love oldhippie60s@yahoo.com
mr charlles r purcell
verry good story i wood love to see a lot more of this all i can say is wow verry good thanks for shareing
Just like real life.
I read your description about what Stephanie's father did and it brought back the real memories. Oddly, it was not triggering today. Maybe I am starting to have a life now. My Step father was of course much more violent, and I am fortunate to have lived.
The Quip about the KY was soooo kewl. I think one of these days I may write a story about what I would do with fundies now; eye of frog, tail of newt, hair off rat's butt...
Mistake?
I hope that was a mistake and you meant Robin's father, not Stephanie's. Stephanie's father is a little distant, but he's not too bad.
I'm sorry if I reminded you of some things best left in the past, but I'm glad to see you got through it to be the decent person you are today.
I promise that next episode will be cute and sweet and possibly romantic, as it deals with Stephanie's big date.
He wasn't being...
...a good guy. He was distorting the intent of the verse. The verse in the old is reiterated in the new when it speaks about men not covering their head and women covering their head. Those verses gave rise to the custom of men removing their hats as a courtesy when they are indoors. Specifically it speaks about having long hair (being a man) and having short hair (being a woman). Since there is no direct indication what too long or too short is one can reasonably glean that the infraction follows the intent. By that I mean disguising onesself to appear to be other than they are (basically deceiving someone).
The difference between the old and the new is that the old condemns the new provides redemption. If the old could provide redemption there would have been no need for the new.
Another thing...
... things you want to claim to be private should not be flaunted in public. It is like having a conversation over the phone loud enough for others to hear and then expecting that the conversation remain private. If you want it private keep it that way. Their mistake (one of many) was to make his punishment public. Another mistake was to allow his sister to set the punishment (how subversive to have his sister sit in on the application of his punishment. It seems his feelings of subordination were well founded by that faux pas). Yet another mistake was the punishment itself.